Friday, January 27, 2006

Curses! This sounds awesome, but I'm not eligible for it. Teman?

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Me at Ministry

Embarassing photo time! Whee! I've scanned in a few old pictures and added them to my flickr with the tag "old". I find them to be good for a chuckle...

This photo is of me drinking something called a flaming Hellraiser (yes, the drink is on fire as I suck it through the straw). This was during the winter of '95-'96* at a bar in Paris called Ministry. It was a heavy metal & industrial themed bar - totally awesome. It's unfortunately no longer there...

Note that I am wearing necklaces - I used to have quite a penchant for a few pieces of jewelry. The longer one is a three toed claw clutching an amethyst ball (purchased at Busch Gardens Williamsburg, VA, during my freshman year of high school) and the shorter one is a celtic rune for strength of character. I probably also had an earring in and a couple of rings on. Stylin'!

More old photos...



*actually, according to the date stamp on the photo, it was taken January 3rd, 1996

Monday, January 16, 2006

Humour

My friend Taybin found the funniest blonde joke ever. Check it out!

Monday, January 09, 2006

Me at Machu Picchu

More photos to come later, but here's a teaser photo of me at Machu Picchu.

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Harold Pinter's Nobel prize acceptance speech is very interesting reading.

    Direct invasion of a sovereign state has never in fact been America's favoured method. In the main, it has preferred what it has described as 'low intensity conflict'. Low intensity conflict means that thousands of people die but slower than if you dropped a bomb on them in one fell swoop. It means that you infect the heart of the country, that you establish a malignant growth and watch the gangrene bloom. When the populace has been subdued - or beaten to death - the same thing - and your own friends, the military and the great corporations, sit comfortably in power, you go before the camera and say that democracy has prevailed. This was a commonplace in US foreign policy in the years to which I refer.

    ...

    The United States supported the brutal Somoza dictatorship in Nicaragua for over 40 years. The Nicaraguan people, led by the Sandinistas, overthrew this regime in 1979, a breathtaking popular revolution.

    The Sandinistas weren't perfect. They possessed their fair share of arrogance and their political philosophy contained a number of contradictory elements. But they were intelligent, rational and civilised. They set out to establish a stable, decent, pluralistic society. The death penalty was abolished. Hundreds of thousands of poverty-stricken peasants were brought back from the dead. Over 100,000 families were given title to land. Two thousand schools were built. A quite remarkable literacy campaign reduced illiteracy in the country to less than one seventh. Free education was established and a free health service. Infant mortality was reduced by a third. Polio was eradicated.

    The United States denounced these achievements as Marxist/Leninist subversion. In the view of the US government, a dangerous example was being set. If Nicaragua was allowed to establish basic norms of social and economic justice, if it was allowed to raise the standards of health care and education and achieve social unity and national self respect, neighbouring countries would ask the same questions and do the same things. There was of course at the time fierce resistance to the status quo in El Salvador.

    ...

    The United States finally brought down the Sandinista government. It took some years and considerable resistance but relentless economic persecution and 30,000 dead finally undermined the spirit of the Nicaraguan people. They were exhausted and poverty stricken once again. The casinos moved back into the country. Free health and free education were over. Big business returned with a vengeance. 'Democracy' had prevailed.

    But this 'policy' was by no means restricted to Central America. It was conducted throughout the world. It was never-ending. And it is as if it never happened.

    The United States supported and in many cases engendered every right wing military dictatorship in the world after the end of the Second World War. I refer to Indonesia, Greece, Uruguay, Brazil, Paraguay, Haiti, Turkey, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, and, of course, Chile. The horror the United States inflicted upon Chile in 1973 can never be purged and can never be forgiven.

    Hundreds of thousands of deaths took place throughout these countries. Did they take place? And are they in all cases attributable to US foreign policy? The answer is yes they did take place and they are attributable to American foreign policy. But you wouldn't know it.

    It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn't happening. It didn't matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It's a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.